IMPORTANT!
You must now log in or create an account and confirm your email address before you can create or edit pages.
Sorry for the hassle folks, blame the spammers!

5 April 2012

Non-destructive testing for masonry- part 2

From Preservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Case Study
The New York State Capitol
NY state capitol.jpg
Non destructive evaluation techniques were used to examine existing structural conditions at the New York State Capitol.
Location Albany, New York
Owner New York State government
Built 1867
Project data
Project date 1997
Affected materials masonry
Treatments Use non-destructive testing to evaluate the structure and find alternative methods of repair
Products used non-destructive testing (impulse radar and ultrasonic pulse velocity) “cherry-pickers", scaffolding, and ladders
Project team
Engineer Robert Silman Associates, P.C., U.S. Army Construction Engineering


While non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques have been applied to historic preservation projects in Europe as well as in other countries for many years, their use in the United States has been relatively limited. Most of the American literature about NDE is in the fields of manufacturing and civil engineering works. In manufacturing, for example, dye penetrant tests, x-ray analysis, and ultrasonic techniques aid the evaluation of welds in pipes and pressure vessels. Civil engineers use impact echo testing for the evaluation of concrete bridge decks; ultrasonic methods to determine steel thicknesses in other bridge elements; and electromagnetic equipment to verify the placement of reinforcing bars in concrete structures. NDE techniques now need to be recognized for their potential value to engineers and architects who work on historic structures. Historic construction hidden from view may be successfully understood and conditions assessed while minimizing destructive probe work. The data obtained from conventional probe techniques are generally more limited in accuracy because the data is collected at discrete locations and must be interpolated to estimate the conditions at points between the probes. While it may not be possible to eliminate completely the use of conventional methods to confirm data, the amount of invasive work can be minimized by the implementation of NDE within historic preservation projects.

A variety of NDE techniques are available for use on historic masonry structures.

NDE techniques are particularly useful in historic preservation because original structural drawings are often unavailable or are deficient in detail and do not reflect "as built" conditions. The location and size of framing members and load-bearing elements can usually be determined through NDE. The condition and integrity of a building's structural members can also be determined with the aid of NDE techniques, thus avoiding destructive probe methods, such as test pits, material removal, and core drilling. This is important since conventional probing not only destroys historic fabric, it can be disruptive to the users of the building, and often requires some degree of repair work to reinstate the previous appearance and integrity of the affected building component. NDE available for use on historic masonry structures include radar (also referred to as impulse radar), impact echo, ultrasonic pulse velocity, spectral analysis of surface waves, electromagnetic detection, infrared thermography and fiber optics. Recent work on the New York State Capitol and on Whig Hall at Princeton University (and detailed in the two case studies that follow) demonstrates the practical application of NDE in historic preservation projects

Contents

[edit] The New York State Capitol

The New York State Capitol, constructed between 1867 and 1899, is an opulent masterpiece of the late-nineteenth century, and one of the last American monumental load-bearing structures. Begun by Thomas Fuller in 1867, construction continued until 1876 when appropriations ran out. The next year, construction resumed under the direction of a design advisory board composed of Henry Hobson Richardson, Frederick Law Olmstead, Leopold Eidlitz, and Isaac Perry, the first New York State Architect. Extraordinary care was taken in every aspect of its design, and more than $25 million was spent on construction. In 1979, the structure was designated a National Historic Landmark by the U.S. Department of the Interior.

[edit] Problem

The 400 by 300 foot granite structure is 5 stories tall, with a full basement and attic. Although basement foundation walls up to 16-feet thick support the 200,000 ton building load, the Capitol has suffered significant structural problems since construction. The building load is spread unequally over the foundation, and the site contains layers of local clay mixed with sand and water, which is susceptible to liquefaction. When these conditions were discovered during the initial excavation, the idea of using wood pilings was abandoned and a 3-foot thick unreinforced concrete slab was placed over the excavation to support stepped stone footings for walls and piers. By 1990, the Commission for the Restoration of the Capitol determined that a comprehensive structural documentation of the building was essential to its long-term preservation. Original structural drawings did not exist, and most construction records were lost in a 1911 fire. This new study would determine at what locations the subsurface clay was being overloaded; help explain and document the sources of previous failures in the building; identify those areas where code-required alterations, such as new fire stairs, would be best located; and enable the Commission to develop appropriate responses to ongoing requests for additional mezzanines and storage areas.

[edit] Evaluation

Robert Silman Associates, P.C., was retained in 1991 to produce a structural analysis of the northwest quadrant of the Capitol, and a feasibility study that would explore the potential of the building to absorb additional live loads. The project would involve preparation of structural drawings documenting the size, location and type of structural components. An unusual aspect of the work was a research component to correlate results of NDE techniques with conventional destructive probe methods. If NDE techniques could be successfully applied, damage to the building and disruption to its occupants could be minimized in analysis of the other parts of the Capitol. The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory assisted in the research by providing staff and equipment through its Construction Productivity Advancement Research Program. By employing NDE in the same areas that would subsequently be opened with destructive probes, the research team intended to show the practical applications of NDE techniques, and demonstrate the reduced physical damage to historic buildings. NDE would also mean substantial cost savings for the work. The NDE techniques employed included radar, impact echo, ultrasonic pulse velocity and spectral analysis of surface waves, electromagnetic detection, infrared thermography, and fiber optics. Using these techniques, the work was intended to supplement archival research and a visual survey to locate and assess the conditions of the structural components (beams, girders, columns, and bearing walls). Finally, traditional destructive procedures would take place, as necessary, to confirm findings and to provide a comparative basis for determining how and when NDE techniques could be used in lieu of destructive procedures, and what degree of accuracy was achievable for the techniques tested.

[edit] Solution (Test Results)

NDE at the New York State Capitol was undertaken through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, under the supervision of Robert Silman Associates. The Laboratory relied on outside consultants to operate and interpret equipment. Approximately ten days of site work were required to survey one quadrant of the building from the basement through the roof.

The floor structure is scanned using impulse radar. An operator pushes the transducer across the floor at a constant speed.

The NDE techniques utilized at the New York State Capitol were experimental in nature. Because the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory participated in the project as a means to develop the procedures for its own purposes, six techniques were used and evaluated.

[edit] Impulse Radar

For the New York State Capitol project, the radar tests successfully located embedded beams, girders, columns, and metal ties/anchors. The readings enabled the investigators to profile brick arches spanning roughly 5 feet between beams, and to locate H-shaped steel columns in masonry walls showing the orientation of the flanges.

This is the raw output from a radar scan. Beams, brick arches, and concrete slab were noted.

The tests readily measured the thickness of masonry walls that were well bonded. They were also able to determine the depth-of-cover over beams and girders and brick arches, and the location of Results were less conclusive for the thick stone footings, where the high water table, large quantities of metal near the surface, and the existence of conductive surfaces (false floors with air spaces below) impacted the ability of the equipment to locate the footings. More than any other technique, the radar penetrated the masonry effectively, and allowed large portions of the Capitol quadrangle to be scanned continuously and quickly. Another very promising aspect of the research done at the Capitol was the application of the backward propagation imaging method to the acquired data in order to provide a computerized visual image of the hidden structure. Further developments of this system would allow architects and engineers to measure hidden features directly from a plotted image, making the technique more "user friendly."

Above: The impact echo equipment includes a hammer, receiver, and water soluble coupling gel and was used to locate a steel column concealed behind the granite facing. Photo: Dennis Sack. Below: Data is shown on the field computer screen.

[edit] Impact Echo

Impact echo produced good data for reading wall thicknesses and the integrity of granite and sandstone columns, veneer walls, and brick walls less than two feet thick. While steel columns behind granite facing were located, the orientation of flanges was not discernible. The impact echo test provided excellent results in detecting stone cracking parallel to the surface. Its optimal use was when working with homogenous stone materials; with multiple layers of material (example: terrazzo over brick) it did not produce good results. Brick arches and beams were not detected, and the presence of energy absorbing materials like plaster proved an impediment.

[edit] Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity

Ultrasonic pulse velocity proved to be an excellent technique for determining the thicknesses and relative soundness of solid granite and sandstone columns. In composite walls, the velocity and signal strength dropped across mortar joints. Low frequency pulse velocity signals can provide good results for thick brick walls where multiple mortar joints would otherwise block the transmission of higher frequency signals.

Ultrasonic pulse velocity is being used to obtain typical wave velocities for granite. Note transmitter on one side of the column and receiver on opposite.

A disadvantage of the low frequency energy is that the long wavelengths result in an "averaging" effect, which decreases the resolution of the method and does not allow for the location of smaller scale damage, such as brick unit de-bonding. In general, the results correlated well with the impact echo results. The two techniques should be used in conjunction; ultrasonic pulse velocity provides characteristic wave velocity measurement for the specific test material and impact echo assesses voids and thickness with access to only one side of the surface.

[edit] Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves

Spectral analysis of surface waves required access to only one side of the material being measured. It worked well on brick and solid stone, and on the composite slab on grade at the cellar floor, but was less successful when used on thinner walls and framed slabs. Due to the sensitivity of the equipment, the technique was not suitable for measuring thicknesses of floors and walls. Additionally, the presence of plaster and other energy-absorbing materials proved an impediment. This process was more time consuming than the others.

This electromagnetic detection instrument is designed to locate rebars in concrete for quality control inspections. The diameter of the bar and depth-of-cover is calculated and digitally displayed.

[edit] Electromagnetic Detection

This imaging technique worked well at locating iron beams and girders supporting brick arches that had as much as 9 inches of cover, provided no wire mesh existed. It was also successful at locating steel columns behind up to 8 inches of granite, and locating iron anchors in stone walls. Where wire mesh exists, such as in flat concrete slabs, the results were inconsistent.

[edit] Infrared Thermography

This imaging technique was useful in locating hidden pipes and flues within masonry walls. The images of deteriorated brick masonry (water and salt damage) and patched areas of exterior granite walls clearly showed as anomalies. A dense, undamaged portion of masonry will retain less moisture than a porous area. The moisture content will affect the surface temperature of the material, thus identifying it as being different from surrounding areas, even when the area appears to be the same as the undeteriorated area to the naked eye. Although, theoretically, one should be able to image voids behind the surface of a stone face, this was not achieved at the Capitol. The reason for this failure is probably related to the sensitivity of the equipment, the wavelength bands being recorded, and high ambient humidity levels during testing. This technique did not prove useful for imaging roof trusses through clay tile roofing.

[edit] Fiber Optics

Fiber Optics. Since the Capitol is a solid masonry building with few voids, the utility of fiber optics in the project was limited. However, it did allow assessment of the interiors of wall chases and flues, including the condition of their mortar joints. It was also used to access the space above decorative hung ceilings; however, the focal length was not sufficient to provide overall views of beams and girders.

[edit] Project Summary

Of the NDE techniques employed on this heavy masonry building, radar proved to be the most successful for imaging hidden structure and conditions. Next, in order of success, were impact echo, ultrasonic pulse velocity, spectral analysis of surface waves, and infrared thermography. Electromagnetic detection was very useful, but its scope is limited to buildings that contain some iron or steel and to locations where framing members are isolated from pipes, conduits, and other metal features. Fiber optics was found to be of minimal use in this type of building because of the limited areas where voids were present. One problem to consider is the need to have highly trained equipment operators present, as well as sophisticated computer programs that can translate the raw data into meaningful results. In some cases, despite inherent non-destructive testing costs, the number or conventional probes that can be eliminated will offset these expenses.

Public domain Original source: hhttp://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/tech-notes/Tech-Notes-Masonry04.pdf

This article contains material based on a work of a National Park Service employee, created during the course of the person's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government, such material is in the public domain. See the NPS copyright policy for more information.

US-NationalParkService-ShadedLogo.svg
Personal tools
preservapedia